A teacher who uses the liberationist approach is almost a
mix between the executive approach and the facilitator approach. To me, it collects certain aspects from both
of the other approaches. It focuses on the knowledge of the students, like an
executive would. Then, it also focuses on helping the students grow as better
human beings, like a facilitator would. It has some of the same concepts going
on but the liberationist approach is quite different from the executive and
facilitator approaches. Liberationist teachers see knowledge in a completely
different light than executive teachers do. They see the ends as something
different that facilitator teachers do.
For me, personally, I think it would be somewhat hard to use
a liberationist approach to teaching. I feel that it doesn’t have the right
type of structure to it to help in learning mathematics or chemistry. I am
talking about using a pure liberationist approach though. I wouldn’t mind doing
hands-on projects in either of my subjects and connecting them to different
things in the world. I could easily connect math to every day issues. Chemistry
would be able to be connected to food and beverages we eat and drink every day.
The relations to life are what help the students to see why they are learning
topics and going to school at all. At the same time though, I think more
executive aspects will appear in my classroom. I do like the points about
mannerisms of being a liberationist teacher. I think it almost applies to
teaching in general though. If you don’t have the ability to have the right
mannerisms, you won’t be able to connect with the students in the way that they
need in order to learn. I think it is important for teachers and students to
find that connection or relationship to help aid in the reinforcement of
wanting and needing to learn and the ability to learn.
I think that Fenstermacher would argue that the liberationist is not a mix between executive and facilitator. I think that he would argue that they are distinct styles of teaching. It is a common thought, however, to think of them as a mixture because we really only have experiences with the two. Yet, for the liberationist, the ends are going to become extremely important. The teacher who is a liberationist is going to be pushing for some type of change, which might not come from a facilitator or an executive but from a discussion.
ReplyDelete